Welcome to my humble abode.
How we invite in parasites is a very curious thing. It seems odd that more often than not we put ourselves in positions to be parasited and taken advantage of. Rickles speaks of the human’s desire to be parasited when discussing the fact that a vampire must be invited into one’s home. This aspect of a vampire is something that is very contradicting to the norm when thinking of a parasite. The usual connotation that comes with a parasite is something that is unwanted, a burden on one’s life and livelihood. Rickles then sets us up to wonder: If a vampire must be invited in to be able to parasite you (something we shouldn’t want), then how are they so successful (the proof of their success coming from the human’s obsession with them)? One can come to a tentative conclusion that us humans want to be parasited, we do not feel complete until there is something inside us or something branching off of our business.
In intimate relationships the parasite is an ever-present figure. It is the flea that inhabits our mind and body, controlling a good portion of our actions and thoughts. Those who we are in relationships with influence who we want to spend time with, and even what we eat. Even if one likes to believe that they are a separate entity, the opposite party, or significant other influences us and puts us in situations that question free will. As Stephen reminds us in his “Identity Interrupted (Parasites) blog.
“Some time ago there was written on the board the question: Who are we when we write? With the intriguing and frightening knowledge that parasites may be able to manipulate our emotions or even our complex behavior, the question may just as well be: Who are we? Is free will even an option any more?”
So if we have this illusion of free will that parasites can exploit, maybe there is an illusion of a home that vampires can exploit. Whose definition of a home sets the standard for the relationship between a vampire and his prey? Is it the guest that sets the stage, in that case the coffin would be home and everything but the already dead is fair game, or does the host create the definition of a home.
If we look at the second option than this rule that governs the vampire becomes even more ambiguous. The spectrum of what a home is could range from that of a homeless man to a cowboy at home on the “range”, or to a patriot who considers their country home. How does the host argue this point to the guest in an attempt to fend off an attack, and if the conversation comes down to logistics and is drawn out in politics it no longer seems like much of an attack. However, it seems more often than not the parasite eventually gets in and we become the victim, the victim of the parasite and the victim of free will.
Rickles makes it a strong point that the parasite easily becomes at home in our economy. These types of parasites hangout unnoticed in our home (economy) for a long time before manifesting themselves, before taking all that they can from the host leaving it weak and fighting for life. This parasite has begun to show it self in the economy of Greece. Greece is in the middle of a financial crisis with bureaucratic parasitism that dwarfs what we have recently seen in the United States. After taking loans on top of loans from banks that helped the country reclassify and recategorize their debt in ways in which it would essentially not need to be paid back, the country is on the brink of bankruptcy and threatening the value of the Euro, and therefore all the other countries in the European Union. The parasite that manifests itself in these large banks enticed its host (Greece) with promises of profit and essentially free money, insuring the idea of a perpetually growing economy. The economy then took a pause, Greece’s debt was called in and the parasite was revealed. Now, in a time of economic crisis created by the banks the parasite continues to try and profit from it’s host. Nelson D. Schwartz and Eric Dash of The New York Times describes the situation very poetically (poetry is in the eye of the beholder).
Bets by some of the same banks that helped Greece shroud its mounting debts may actually now be pushing the nation closer to the brink of financial ruin… These contracts, known as credit-default swaps, effectively let banks and hedge funds wager on the financial equivalent of a four-alarm fire: a default by a company, or in the case of Greece and entire country. If Greece reneges on its debts, traders who own these swaps stand to profit. “It’s like buying fire insurance on your neighbor’s house – you create an incentive to burn down the house,” said Philip Gisdakis, head of credit strategy at UniCredit in Munich.
The head honchos in Greece, under some perceived free will, invited the parasite to lay its head for the night, but only to figure out that the parasite will not leave, but multiply until there is no more room and it must move on.
With no particular direction.